FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1)

Xia & Qiu (No 6) [2024] FedCFamC1F 8

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1)

Xia & Qiu [2022] FedCFamC1F 933

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 1) APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Xia & Qiu (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC1A 132
Appeal from: Xia & Qiu (No 9) [2024] FedCFamC1F 811
Appeal number: NAA 358 of 2024
File number: CAC 1782 of 2018
Judgment of: ALDRIDGE, WILLIAMS & SMITH JJ
Date of judgment: 25 July 2025
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – Appeal from costs order –
Where the primary judge ordered the appellants to be
jointly and severally liable for the respondent’s costs –
Where the primary judge found the appellants had relied on

In Xia & Qiu (No 6), the Court found at [278] that the property of the parties available for adjustment was as follows:

Property Ownership Value

50 Samaria St Crace ACT Jointly owned by the husband and wife $1,550,000
11 Stutchbury St Page ACT Jointly owned by the husband and wife $840,000
Page Mortgage ($159,128)
Minhang Apartment Husband’s share $470,000(This is not mine)
Toyota Kluger Husband $9,000
Where are wives cars - Missing values
Savings Wife $6,365
Husband $6,967

From my experience in the Australian Family Court in Canberra, I've found it to be quite challenging. It seems some judges may leverage their authority in ways that favour their acquaintances in the legal field, often to the detriment of fathers. Decisions often appear to be based on conjecture rather than certainty. There is no fairness in this court, especially 

In my mind, I always think "Am I a Provider? How can I be a Provider?".

I don't want to make a large scale of my meaning of a Provider, it only focuses on that I want to create something and attract a lot of users. And I want to be a provider, like Google, ChatGPT, Netflix, Microsoft, SpaceX, Tesla, Huawei, etc.