In Xia & Qiu (No 6), the Court found at [278] that the property of the parties available for adjustment was as follows:

Property Ownership Value

50 Samaria St Crace ACT Jointly owned by the husband and wife $1,550,000
11 Stutchbury St Page ACT Jointly owned by the husband and wife $840,000
Page Mortgage ($159,128)
Minhang Apartment Husband’s share $470,000(This is not mine)
Toyota Kluger Husband $9,000
Where are wives cars - Missing values
Savings Wife $6,365
Husband $6,967
- Where is my saving? This is absolutely bullshits. ACT Revenue refund Husband $91,620
(This is paid back to my uncle's investment, still owing him $340k - $91620) Heseltine St proceeds Husband $92,076.84
(This is paid into our joint things, I did not take those money) WNA Group Pty Ltd Joint Nil
- Allow the wife transferred the money into her parents AWAQ Pty Ltd shares Wife Nil
- Allow the wife transferred the money into her parents QF and XL Family Trust Joint Nil
- No money anyway from the start, dickhead judge, open your eyes to read it properly. Query add-backs – do not add-back rather s 75(2)(o)
(She transferred 10k and 50k, no adding back, they were your court orders, dickhead) Credit cards Wife ($8,949)
Debt to 2nd and 3rd resp Joint ($229,916)
- miscalculate again, it will be in Chinese Court and then we will 'slab' your face, dickhead. Superannuation Wife $9,394

There are heaps missing dickhead, and try to discredit me but you are the one is an absolutely joke in Australia, if you want to help DDCS, your friend, just do so.

Xia & Qiu (No 7) [2024] FedCFamC1F 281 2

Superannuation Husband $180,000
8 The net pool was $2,857,000 which was to be divided so that the wife received 60 per cent
($1,714,000) and the husband 40 per cent ($1,143,000).

Shane Gill, you are a pig of Australian family law. We will sue you in China same to your friend DDCS twist true stories.